|
Albemarle Sound
Other Names: None
Location: Chowan County and Washington County
Campaign: Operations against Plymouth (April-May 1864)
Date(s): May 5, 1864
Principal Commanders: Capt. Melancton Smith [US]; Cdr. J. W.
Cooke [CS]
Forces Engaged: 9 gunboats [US]; Confederate ram [CS]
Estimated Casualties: 88 total
| CSS Albemarle (Interpretive Marker) |

|
| (Click to Enlarge) |
Description: On May 5, CSS Albemarle (aka CSS ram Albemarle) fought seven
blockading Union ships to a draw at the mouth of the Roanoke River. Federals recaptured the converted steamer Bombshell. USS
Sassacus was badly damaged.
Result(s): Inconclusive
Union and Confederate Naval Battle of Albemarle Sound:
Two weeks after the Battle of Plymouth (April 17-20,
1864), in which the C.S.S. Albemarle played a major role, the Confederate ironclad met seven Union ships in Albemarle
Sound (see North Carolina Outer Banks: Albemarle Sound and Pamlico Sound).
| CSS Albemarle Historical Marker |

|
| Civil War Battle of Albemarle Sound, NC |
The encounter has come to be known as the “Battle of Batchelor’s Bay,” although the events took place
in the sound some distance east of the bay. On May 5, 1864, the
Albemarle weighed anchor and started down the Roanoke River headed for New Bern. On entering the sound, the ironclad, under command of Captain J. W. Cooke, and
her escort vessels were attacked by four double-ended steamers and three smaller gunboats under Captain Melancton Smith. The
Albemarle opened attack late in the day. Leading the first
line of attack was the Union flagship, the Mattabesett. The Albemarle
returned her fire, destroying the launch and cutting away some of the standing and running rigging. The steamer Sassacus struck
the ironclad fullbore and stuck fast. The crew of the Albemarle
then sent a hundred-pound shot through the starboard boiler of the Union vessel and into her wardroom. The scalded men managed
to free the ship and they drifted out of range. All parties then withdrew. Only by throwing butter, lard, and bacon into the
boilers was it possible for the crew of the Albemarle to raise enough steam to return to Plymouth.
Battle of Albemarle Sound Significance:
In April 1864, Confederate forces, with the aid of the CSS Albemarle, forced the
surrender of the Union garrison at Plymouth. Robert Hoke, commander of a Confederate Army in North Carolina, encouraged by his success at Plymouth attempted to retake
New Bern which had been in Union control since early in 1862. For his proposed attack on New Bern, Hoke again sought assistance
from the CSS Albemarle, which had been a decisive factor in the Battle of Plymouth.
| USS Sassacus ramming CSS Albemarle |

|
| (Battle of Albemarle Sound) |
James W. Cooke, commander of the CSS Albemarle sailed out of Plymouth in early May
1864. Steaming south toward New Bern, Cooke ran into a Union fleet at the mouth of Albemarle Sound, commanded by Captain Melancton
Smith. Smith with an advantage in numbers could do little damage to the single Confederate ship. Shots glanced and bounced
off the Albemarle's hull. The USS Sassacus rammed the Albemarle at top speed and caused some significant damage. The Albemarle
began taking on water. The Sassacus had also sustained serious damage from the impact and a shot had burst one of its boilers
scalding its crew. The rest of the Union fleet managed to recapture a converted steamer called the Bombshell. The Sassacus,
by now too damaged to function, drifted down river while the damaged Albemarle proceeded to Plymouth.
The battle was a draw, but the events that followed had more decisive results.
The Albemarle had held its own against greater numbers. The Albemarle’s damage, however, forced the ship into port for
the next several months and prevented it from being used in General Hoke's planned assault on New Bern. Hoke forced the campaign
without the Albemarle. Hoke, subsequently, was recalled to Virginia to assist in the defense of Petersburg and Richmond. The
events in October had a greater impact on the situation. William B. Cushing led a naval raid and detonated a torpedo beneath
the Albemarle’s hull. The removal of Hoke's force and the destruction of the Albemarle allowed both Plymouth and Washington,
North Carolina, to fall back into Union hands.
Sources: John G. Barrett, The Civil War in North Carolina (1963); William
G. Trotter, Ironclads and Columbiads: The Civil War in North Carolina, Volume III, The Coast (1989); Robert G. Elliott, Ironclads
of the Roanoke: Gilbert Elliott’s Albemarle (1994); Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies; National Park
Service.
Recommended Reading:
Confederate Ironclad 1861-65 (New Vanguard). Description: The creation
of a Confederate ironclad fleet was a miracle of ingenuity, improvisation and logistics. Surrounded by a superior enemy fleet,
Confederate designers adapted existing vessels or created new ones from the keel up with the sole purpose of breaking the
naval stranglehold on the nascent country. Her ironclads were built in remote cornfields, on small inland rivers or in naval
yards within sight of the enemy. The result was an unorthodox but remarkable collection of vessels, which were able to contest
the rivers and coastal waters of the South for five years. This title explains how these vessels worked, how they were constructed,
how they were manned and how they fought.
Recommended
Reading: A History of the Confederate Navy
(Hardcover). From Publishers Weekly: One of the most prominent European scholars of the Civil War weighs in with a provocative
revisionist study of the Confederacy's naval policies. For 27 years, University of Genoa history professor Luraghi (The Rise
and Fall of the Plantation South) explored archival and monographic sources on both sides of the Atlantic to develop a convincing
argument that the deadliest maritime threat to the South was not, as commonly thought, the Union's blockade but the North's
amphibious and river operations. Confederate Navy Secretary Stephen Mallory, the author shows, thus focused on protecting
the Confederacy's inland waterways and controlling the harbors vital for military imports. Continued below…
As a result,
from Vicksburg
to Savannah to Richmond, major
Confederate ports ultimately were captured from the land and not from the sea, despite the North's overwhelming naval strength.
Luraghi highlights the South's ingenuity in inventing and employing new technologies: the ironclad, the submarine, the torpedo.
He establishes, however, that these innovations were the brainchildren of only a few men, whose work, although brilliant,
couldn't match the resources and might of a major industrial power like the Union. Nor did
the Confederate Navy, weakened through Mallory's administrative inefficiency, compensate with an effective command system.
Enhanced by a translation that retains the verve of the original, Luraghi's study is a notable addition to Civil War maritime
history. Includes numerous photos.
Recommended
Reading: Iron Afloat: The Story of the Confederate Armorclads. Description: William N. Still's book is rightfully referred to as the standard of Confederate Naval history.
Accurate and objective accounts of the major and even minor engagements with Union forces are combined with extensive background
information. This edition has an enlarged section of historical drawings and sketches. Mr. Still explains the political background
that gave rise to the Confederate Ironclad program and his research is impeccable. An exhaustive literature listing rounds
out this excellent book. While strictly scientific, the inclusion of historical eyewitness accounts and the always fluent
style make this book a joy to read. This book is a great starting point.
Recommended
Reading: Storm over Carolina: The Confederate Navy's Struggle for Eastern
North Carolina. Description: The struggle for control of the eastern waters of North Carolina
during the War Between the States was a bitter, painful, and sometimes humiliating one for the Confederate navy. No better
example exists of the classic adage, "Too little, too late." Burdened by the lack of adequate warships, construction
facilities, and even ammunition, the South's naval arm fought bravely and even recklessly to stem the tide of the Federal
invasion of North Carolina from the raging Atlantic. Storm Over Carolina is the account of the Southern navy's struggle in North Carolina waters and it is a saga of crushing defeats interspersed with moments of
brilliant and even spectacular victories. It is also the story of dogged Southern determination and incredible perseverance
in the face of overwhelming odds. Continued below...
For most of
the Civil War, the navigable portions of the Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Chowan, and Pasquotank rivers were
occupied by Federal forces. The Albemarle and Pamlico sounds, as well as most of the coastal towns and counties, were also
under Union control. With the building of the river ironclads, the Confederate navy at last could strike a telling blow against
the invaders, but they were slowly overtaken by events elsewhere. With the war grinding to a close, the last Confederate vessel
in North Carolina waters was destroyed. William T. Sherman
was approaching from the south, Wilmington was lost, and the
Confederacy reeled as if from a mortal blow. For the Confederate navy, and even more so for the besieged citizens of eastern
North Carolina, these were stormy days indeed. Storm Over Carolina describes their story, their struggle, their history.
Recommended
Reading: Ironclads and Columbiads:
The Coast (The Civil War in North Carolina)
(456 pages). Description: Ironclads
and Columbiads covers some of the most important battles and campaigns in the state. In January 1862, Union forces
began in earnest to occupy crucial points on the North Carolina
coast. Within six months, Union army and naval forces effectively controlled coastal North Carolina
from the Virginia line south to present-day Morehead
City. Union setbacks in Virginia, however, led to the withdrawal of many
federal soldiers from North Carolina, leaving only enough Union troops to hold a few coastal strongholds—the vital ports
and railroad junctions. The South during the Civil War, moreover, hotly contested the North’s ability to maintain its
grip on these key coastal strongholds.
Recommended
Reading: The Civil War in the Carolinas (Hardcover). Description: Dan Morrill relates the
experience of two quite different states bound together in the defense of the Confederacy, using letters, diaries, memoirs,
and reports. He shows how the innovative operations of the Union army and navy
along the coast and in the bays and rivers of the Carolinas affected the general course of
the war as well as the daily lives of all Carolinians. He demonstrates the "total war" for North Carolina's vital coastal railroads and ports. In the latter
part of the war, he describes how Sherman's operation cut
out the heart of the last stronghold of the South. Continued below...
The author
offers fascinating sketches of major and minor personalities, including the new president and state governors, Generals Lee,
Beauregard, Pickett, Sherman, D.H. Hill, and Joseph E. Johnston. Rebels and abolitionists, pacifists and unionists, slaves
and freed men and women, all influential, all placed in their context with clear-eyed precision. If he were wielding a needle
instead of a pen, his tapestry would offer us a complete picture of a people at war. Midwest Book Review: The Civil War in the Carolinas by civil war expert and historian
Dan Morrill (History Department, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and Director of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historical
Society) is a dramatically presented and extensively researched survey and analysis of the impact the American Civil War had
upon the states of North Carolina and South Carolina, and the people who called these states their home. A meticulous, scholarly,
and thoroughly engaging examination of the details of history and the sweeping change that the war wrought for everyone, The
Civil War In The Carolinas is a welcome and informative addition to American Civil War Studies reference collections.
|