 |
| Thomas' Legion |
| Introduction & How to Use this Site |
| Cherokee Chief William Holland Thomas |
| Causes and Motives: American Civil War |
| Organization of Union and Confederate Armies: Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery |
| American Civil War: Union and Confederate Navies |
| American Civil War: The Soldier's Life |
| American Civil War: Casualties, Battles and Battlefields |
| Civil War's Turning Points |
| Civil War Casualties, Fatalities & Statistics |
| Civil War Generals |
| American Civil War Desertion and Deserters: Union and Confederate |
| Civil War Prisoner of War Prison Union Confederate Prisons |
| Aftermath and Reconstruction |
| Civil War Genealogy and Research Tools |
| American Civil War Pictures - Photographs |
| African Americans and American Civil War History |
| NORTH CAROLINA HISTORY |
| North Carolina American Civil War Statistics, Battles, History |
| North Carolina Civil War History and Battles |
| North Carolina Civil War Regiments and Battles |
| North Carolina Coast: American Civil War |
| HISTORY OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA |
| Western North Carolina and the American Civil War |
| Western North Carolina Civil War |
| HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE INDIANS |
| Cherokee Indians: American Civil War |
| History of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indian Nation |
| Cherokee Indian Heritage, History, Culture, Customs, Ceremonies, and Religion |
| Cherokee War Rituals, Culture, Festivals, Government, and Beliefs |
| Researching your Cherokee Heritage |
| Recommended American Indian History |
| North Carolina: American Civil War Photos |
| Thomas' Legion Papers, Diaries, and Memoirs |
| American Civil War Polls |
| Civil War History |
| Recommended American Civil War History |
| Civil War Video Games |
|
|
 |
|
Battle of Wilmington, North Carolina
Other Names: Fort
Anderson, Town Creek, Forks Road, Sugar Loaf Hill
Location: New Hanover County
Campaign: Operations against Fort Fisher and Wilmington (January-February 1865)
Date(s): February 12-22, 1865
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. John Schofield [US]; Gen. Braxton
Bragg [CS]
Forces Engaged: Cox’s, Ames’s, and Paine’s
Divisions (12,000) [US]; Hoke’s Division, Hagood’s Brigade (6,600) [CS]
Estimated Casualties: 1,150 total
| The Battle of Wilmington |

|
| Battle of Wilmington (Fall of Wilmington: Historical Marker) |
Description: With the fall
of Fort Fisher to Maj. Gen. Alfred Terry’s and Rear Adm. David Porter’s
combined operation on January 15, Wilmington’s days were numbered. About 6,600 Confederate troops under Maj. Gen. Robert
Hoke held Fort Anderson and a line of works that prevented the Federals from advancing up the Cape Fear River. Early February, the XXIII Corps arrived at Fort Fisher, and Maj. Gen.
John Schofield took command of the Union forces. Schofield now began a series of maneuvers to force the Confederates
to abandon their defenses. On February 16, Jacob Cox’s division ferried across the river to confront Fort Anderson,
while Porter’s gunboats bombarded the fort. On February 17-18, Ames’s division conducted a wide flanking march
to get in the fort’s rear. Seeing the trap ready to close, the Confederates evacuated Fort Anderson during the night
of the 18th-19th, withdrawing to Town Creek to form a new defensive line. The next day, this line collapsed to increasing
Federal pressures. During the night of February 21-22, Gen. Braxton Bragg ordered the evacuation of Wilmington, burning cotton, tobacco, and government stores. (See Battle of Wilmington: A History.)
Fort Anderson, not to be confused with Fort Anderson (aka Deep Gully) in
Craven County, was a large earthen fort that guarded the port of Wilmington, on the western bank of the Cape Fear
River defense system (see: Cape Fear River Map and Approaches to Fort Fisher and Wilmington, and Battle of Fort Anderson: Gateway to Wilmington). After the fall of Fort Fisher, Fort Anderson was bombarded and
seized by Union troops during their march to capture Wilmington. Its beautifully preserved coastal defenses were
built atop the ruins of colonial Brunswick Town.
Result(s): Union victory
Sources: National Park Service; Official Records of the Union and Confederate
Armies
Recommended
Reading:
The Wilmington Campaign: Last
Departing Rays of Hope. Description: While prior books on the battle to capture Wilmington,
North Carolina, have focused solely on the epic struggles for Fort Fisher, in many respects this was just
the beginning of the campaign. In addition to complete coverage (with significant new information) of both battles for Fort Fisher, "The Wilmington Campaign" includes the first
detailed examination of the attack and defense of Fort Anderson. Continued below…
It
also features blow-by-blow accounts of the defense of the Sugar Loaf Line and of the operations of Federal warships on the
Cape Fear River.
This masterpiece of military history proves yet again that there is still much to be learned about the American Civil War.
"The
Wilmington Campaign is a splendid achievement. This gripping chronicle of the five-weeks' campaign up the Cape
Fear River adds a crucial dimension to our understanding of the Confederacy's collapse." -James McPherson, Pulitzer
Prize-winning author of Battle Cry of Freedom
Related Studies:
Cape Fear River Map and Approaches
to Fort Fisher and Wilmington
Recommended
Reading: The Wilmington
Campaign and the Battle for Fort
Fisher, by Mark A. Moore. Description:
Full campaign and battle history of the largest combined operation in U.S.
military history prior to World War II. By late 1864, Wilmington
was the last major Confederate blockade-running seaport open to the outside world. The final battle for the port city's protector--Fort Fisher--culminated
in the largest naval bombardment of the American Civil War, and one of the worst hand-to-hand engagements in four years of
bloody fighting. Continued below…
Copious
illustrations, including 54 original maps drawn by the author. Fresh new analysis on the fall of Fort Fisher,
with a fascinating comparison to Russian defenses at Sebastopol during the Crimean War. “A
tour de force. Moore's Fort Fisher-Wilmington Campaign is
the best publication of this character that I have seen in more than 50 years.” -- Edwin C. Bearss, Chief Historian
Emeritus, National Park
Service
Recommended
Reading: Fort Anderson: The Battle For
Wilmington. Description: A detailed but highly readable study of the largest and strongest interior
fortification guarding the Confederacy's last major seaport of Wilmington,
North Carolina. An imposing earthen bastion, Fort Anderson was the scene of a massive two-day
Union naval bombardment and ground assault in late February 1865. Continued below…
The fort's
fall sealed Wilmington's doom. More than a military campaign study, Fort
Anderson: Battle for Wilmington
examines the history of the fort's location from its halcyon days as North Carolina's leading
colonial port of Brunswick
to its beginnings as a Confederate fortification in 1862 and its fall to Union forces three years later. The fort also had
several eerie connections to President Abraham Lincoln's assassination. Today the fort is part of the tranquil Brunswick Town
State Historic Site. Fort Anderson: Battle for Wilmington is liberally illustrated
with maps and illustrations, including many previously unpublished soldiers' images. It also contains an order of battle,
endnotes, bibliography and index.
Recommended
Reading:
Confederate Goliath: The Battle of Fort Fisher. From Publishers
Weekly: Late in the Civil War, Wilmington, N.C., was the sole
remaining seaport supplying Lee's army at Petersburg, Va.,
with rations and munitions. In this dramatic account, Gragg describes the two-phase campaign by which Union forces captured
the fort that guarded Wilmington and the subsequent occupation of the city itself--a victory that virtually doomed the Confederacy.
In the initial phase in December 1864, General Ben Butler and Admiral David Porter directed an unsuccessful amphibious assault
against Fort Fisher
that included the war's heaviest artillery bombardment. Continued below…
The
second try in January '65 brought General Alfred Terry's 9000-man army against 1500 ill-equipped defenders, climaxing in a
bloody hand-to-hand struggle inside the bastion and an overwhelming Union victory. Although historians tend to downplay the
event, it was nevertheless as strategically decisive as the earlier fall of either Vicksburg or Atlanta. Gragg
has done a fine job in restoring this important campaign to public attention. Includes numerous photos.
Recommended
Reading: A History of the Confederate Navy
(Hardcover). From Publishers Weekly: One of the most prominent European scholars of the Civil War weighs in with a provocative
revisionist study of the Confederacy's naval policies. For 27 years, University of Genoa history professor Luraghi (The Rise
and Fall of the Plantation South) explored archival and monographic sources on both sides of the Atlantic to develop a convincing
argument that the deadliest maritime threat to the South was not, as commonly thought, the Union's blockade but the North's
amphibious and river operations. Confederate Navy Secretary Stephen Mallory, the author shows, thus focused on protecting
the Confederacy's inland waterways and controlling the harbors vital for military imports. Continued below…
As a result,
from Vicksburg
to Savannah to Richmond, major
Confederate ports ultimately were captured from the land and not from the sea, despite the North's overwhelming naval strength.
Luraghi highlights the South's ingenuity in inventing and employing new technologies: the ironclad, the submarine, the torpedo.
He establishes, however, that these innovations were the brainchildren of only a few men, whose work, although brilliant,
couldn't match the resources and might of a major industrial power like the Union. Nor did
the Confederate Navy, weakened through Mallory's administrative inefficiency, compensate with an effective command system.
Enhanced by a translation that retains the verve of the original, Luraghi's study is a notable addition to Civil War maritime
history. Includes numerous photos.
|
 |
|
|
|
Try our "Search Engine," this website contains several hundred pages.
This website is best viewed with Microsoft
Internet Explorer.
|
|
|
 |