|
Emergence of Neurology as a Specialty in the United States
As a new medical specialty, American neurology developed in the mid- and late-nineteenth century under the
influence of three primary forces: European Medicine and Scientific Advances, the American Civil War and the particular
American penchant for Medical Specialization or Specialism. Founded in European traditions, American neurology developed
and expanded rapidly with the greatest concentration of activity in Philadelphia, Boston and New York. Whereas Americans interested
in advanced specialty training originally traveled to Paris, Berlin, London, or Vienna, by 1900, important neurological hospitals,
laboratories, and outpatient specialty services in the United States attracted American students and physicians to remain
in this country for their training. Furthermore, the reverse flow of Europeans coming to study in the United States began.
European Training
The scientific and medical infrastructure of American neurology was European in origin, although Americans
borrowed eclectically and modified the European traditions. The Bernardian concept of Experimental Medicine was crystallized
in America by Brown-Séquard who visited the United States on multiple occasions and served briefly on the faculty at Harvard
Medical School in 1866 and 1867. Medically, neurology in Europe grew from two distinct models, as an outgrowth and subdivision
of internal medicine as seen prototypically in France, and as an ally and anatomically-based offspring of psychiatry, as typified
by the Viennese school. J.M. Charcot, perhaps the most celebrated nineteenth century neurologist, was trained as an internist,
and his early research and testing effort focused on rheumatological and geriatric medicine. Charcot's studies of rheumatoid
arthritis and tabetic (Charcot) joints led him to investigate peripheral and central nervous system pathology. Meynert, on
the other hand, entered neurological research from the primary vantage point of psychiatry, the field to which the Germanic
and Prussian schools had heretofore designated the study of general paresis of the insane, epileptic fits, and most encephalopathies. These
two European traditions were simultaneously incorporated in the United States to form early neurological programs particular
to America in the form of neurological professorships, teaching services, and research efforts. Working simultaneously from
the two disciplines of internal medicine and psychiatry, American neurology sculpted itself with close links to both traditions,
creating some neurological activities directly out of medical departments, and creating others out of psychiatric asylums
and other institutes. The titles of early American neurological professorial chairs, the names of early journals and societies,
and the background of physicians who eventually became known as neurologists are all clear testimony to the double-image,
or Janus evolution, of American neurology in its early years.
 |
Drawing of Charcot
In Paris, American post-graduates interested in neurology studied under Charcot. While daily rounds were typically reserved
for Charcot and his inner circle of assistants, the occasional American apprentice was also included in these exercises that
sometimes lasted late into the day, particularly when autopsies were performed. |
|
 |
Meynert and Chiari
American apprentices working under Meynert in Vienna and Chiari in Prague received three or five weekly lectures on clinical,
anatomic, and pathophysiologic aspects of neurological disease. At the end of the lecture, the professor commonly exhibited
two or three patients and elicited the telling of clinical signs. |
|
 |
American Neurologists who Studied in Europe
Click to left to see chart of American Doctors and where they trained in Europe. |
|
American Civil War The American Civil War was incontestably
the primary local historical event pivotal to the development of neurology in the United States. The gamut of neurological
injuries seen among soldiers on both sides and the coalescing of an identified group of US physicians interested in neurological
studies provided the setting for distinctive American contributions to the developing field. Shortly after William A. Hammond
was named US Surgeon General, he became acutely aware of the breadth of war-related peripheral and central nervous system
injuries among Union soldiers. Administratively, Hammond contributed fundamentally to the institutionalization of neurology
in the United States by establishing Turner's Lane Hospital in Philadelphia, the site of S. Weir Mitchell's, Keen's, and Morehouse's
seminal work on various nervous system disorders during the war. In developing a hospital devoted specifically to neurological
military injuries and their study, Hammond provided the first American site for focused neurological investigation. This war-time
model was incorporated to post-war Philadelphia medicine in the form of the celebrated Philadelphia Orthopedic Hospital and
Infirmary for Nervous Diseases. The Civil War provided American physicians with case material for journal and monograph publications
on peripheral nerve injuries, post-traumatic epilepsy, neurasthenia, malingering, and many other areas of neurological study.
These publications brought international attention to American neurologists in the post-war era. During the Reconstruction Era, Hammond and Mitchell carried their war-time organizational skills and commitment to neurology in other civilian settings
and helped to develop new neurological services, educational programs, journals and textbooks that solidified American neurology
in the international medical arena.
 |
American Civil War Soldiers
The Civil War was associated with innumerable injuries of the head and extremities causing a gamut of central and peripheral
nervous system lesions. The soldiers formed a cohort of neurologically impaired patients and the study of their injuries became
a hallmark of early American neurology. |
|
 |
Turner's Lane Hospital, 1862
Assigned by Surgeon General William A. Hammond to work in the military hospital system at Turner's Lane Hospital in Philadelphia,
Mitchell meticulously documented peripheral nerve lesions encountered in battle and studied post-traumatic disorders like
phantom limb and causalgia. |
|
 |
Frontpiece of Injuries of Nerves
| Mitchell's spirit of personal mentorship and responsibility for training younger neurological colleagues
began even during the Civil War years. W. Keen recalled: |
| |
Observe his broad-minded generosity. Instead of planning the work for himself and Morehouse,
and in a preface expressing in complimentary terms their obligation to myself as their assistant, he had all three of us work
together in consultation. The books and papers which he wrote were by "Mitchell, Morehouse and Keen", and any which I wrote
were - mirabile dictu "Keen, Mitchell and Morehouse." My name, that of an unknown medical "kid" only two years after
my graduation in medicine, preceded both of theirs. | |
|
 |
William A. Hammond
Surgeon General, United States Army |
|
Specialization
During the second half of the nineteenth century, two primary medical factors fostered the emergence of neurology
as a separate clinical specialty. First, and largely due to European scientists, an unprecedented and exponential growth of
neurological knowledge occurred during this period. Second, a general movement towards subdivisions of medical practice internationally
was already in full development in France, Great Britain, and the Prussian states. Initially, many American general practitioners
of the era resisted specialization, and specifically neurological specialization, as a challenge to the established practice
of medicine. In a sarcastic 1881 editorial, Specialism on the Rampage, one such clinician stated:
| |
We noticed the appointment of a very worthy physician in an eastern city as 'Neurologist of the
Hospital' which title he assumes in writing as an author. Cannot some other specialties be created to give positions to other
aspiring gentlemen? Why not have a Pneumatologist to attend to the lungs -- a Thermatologist to observe temperature -- a Narcotizer
to see that the patients sleep well -- a Defecator to attend to the bowels? |
Despite this condemnation, select American medical institutions embraced the initiative to support specialists
and established lectureships, specialty clinics, and services devoted specifically to neurology. The growing wealthy class
of the Industrial Revolution willingly supported specialized treatment of their ailments and made specialization financially
rewarding. Without accreditation mechanisms in place at the local or national level, however, marketing strategies, rather
than in-depth education, created some American "specialists" of questionable qualifications. This dilemma led to substantial
re-evaluation of specialization movements at the very end of the nineteenth century, and neurology, along with other new specialties,
realigned themselves with general medicine or consolidated their specialties with alliances to other specialties. In the case
of neurology, early efforts to separate from psychiatry were partially reversed by this concern of isolationism, and closer
ties were established in the early years of the twentieth century, a movement that ultimately culminated in the unification
of a single Board of Psychiatry and Neurology in the mid-1900's
 |
Advertisements
Advertisements like those shown here appeared in medical journals. |
|
 |
Cruveilhier
European anatomists and pathologists, studied the gross anatomy of the nervous system, and later armed with newly invented
staining methods, more clearly delineated the microscopic anatomy of the nervous system. These efforts helped to identify
neurological study as a separate entity among medical sciences. |
|
 |
Claude Bernard
Neurophysiologists conducted experiments pivotal to the eventual elucidation of such concepts as neuronal doctrine, synaptic
function, reflex action, autonomic nervous system control and cerebral function localization. Claude Bernard pioneered animal
physiological experiments that drew students to Paris from centers in the United States as well as Europe. Neurophysiology,
like neuroanatomy and neuropharmacology became vocabulary words that delineate neurological studies as areas of specific specialization. |
|
Recommended
Reading:
Civil War Medicine: Challenges and Triumphs (Hardcover) (475 pages). Description:
Nothing is left unstudied! Alfred Jay Bollet covers a multitude of areas in the world of the medical care/treatment featuring early war ill-preparation,
being overwhelmed, medical science, surgery, amputations, wounds, hospitals, drugs, diseases, prison camps and notable individuals
of the era. Every chapter offers added insight via biographies on individuals that had influence on the subject discussed—thus
adding more intrigue to this book. This book is considered very comprehensive and fair to all parties involved…often
bringing to light the importance of doctors and nurses through out the entire war and its aftermath. Continued below...
Numerous sidebar articles appear throughout the text to embellish points of interest and a nice appendix
is provided, as well as countless charts offering statistical data. Bollet's style is very reader friendly - you don't have
to be that “med student” to enjoy it!
American Neurological Association
Recommended Reading:
Recommended
Reading: Bleeding Blue and Gray: Civil War Surgery and the Evolution of American Medicine (Hardcover:
416 pages) (Random House). Description: A
landmark chronicle of Civil War medicine, Bleeding Blue and Gray is a major contribution to our understanding of America’s
bloodiest conflict. Indeed, eminent surgeon and medical historian Ira M. Rutkow argues that it is impossible to grasp the
harsh realities of the Civil War without an awareness of the state of American medicine at the time. At the outset of the war, the use of ether and chloroform remained crude, and they were often
unavailable in the hellish conditions at the front lines. As a result, many surgical procedures were performed without anesthesia
in the compromised setting of a battleground or a field hospital. This meant that “clinical concerns were often of less
consequence,” writes Rutkow, “than the swiftness of the surgeon’s knife.” Continued below...
Also, in the 1860s, the existence of pathogenic microorganisms was still unknown–many still blamed
“malodorous gasses” for deadly outbreaks of respiratory influenza. As the great Civil War surgeon William Williams
Keen wrote, “we used undisinfected instruments from undisinfected plush-lined cases, and still worse, used marine sponges
which had been used in prior pus cases and had been only washed in tap water.”
Besides the substandard quality of wartime medical supplies and techniques, the
combatants’ utter lack of preparation greatly impaired treatment. In 1861, the Union’s medical corps, mostly ill-qualified and poorly trained, even lacked an ambulance
system. Fortunately, some of these difficulties were ameliorated by the work of numerous relief agencies, especially the United
States Sanitary Commission, led by Frederick Law Olmsted, and tens of thousands of volunteers, among them Louisa May Alcott
and Walt Whitman. From the soldiers who endured the ravages of combat to the
government officials who directed the war machine, from the good Samaritans who organized aid commissions to the nurses who
cared for the wounded, Bleeding Blue and Gray presents a story of suffering, politics, character, and, ultimately, healing. About the Author: Ira
M. Rutkow is a clinical professor of surgery at the University
of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. He also holds a doctorate of
public health from Johns Hopkins
University. Dr. Rutkow’s Surgery: An Illustrated History was a
New York Times Notable Book of the Year. He and his wife divide their time between New
York City and the Catskills.
Recommended Reading: Doctors in Gray: The
Confederate Medical Service (339 pages) (Louisiana State University Press). Description:
Horace Herndon Cunningham has created a comprehensive history of the "Confederate medical services in the Civil War."
Cunningham explains in great detail the many afflictions and circumstances that befell Confederate soldiers and ultimately
resulted in medical treatment by the Confederate doctor. Ironically, his research reflects that the majority of the ill and
wounded soldiers who died had expired due to a burgeoning and developing medical system. Continued below...
Medical advancements, however,
had progressed from primitive to slightly better by the end of the conflict. Cunningham further explains that while the
Confederate doctors did the best that they could with their resources and shortcomings, there were some exceptional doctors
who aided in the advancement of both medicine and medical treatment.
Recommended
Reading: Gangrene and Glory: Medical
Care during the American Civil War (University of
Illinois Press). Description:
Gangrene and Glory covers practically every aspect of the
'medical related issues' in the Civil War and it illuminates the key players in the development and advancement of medicine
and medical treatment. Regarding the numerous diseases and surgical procedures, Author Frank Freemon discusses what transpired
both on and off the battlefield. The Journal of the American Medical Association states: “In Freemon's vivid account, one almost sees the pus, putrefaction, blood, and maggots and . . .
the unbearable pain and suffering.” Continued below...
Interesting historical accounts, statistical data, and pictures enhance this book. This research is not
limited to the Civil War buff, it is a must read for the individual interested in medicine, medical procedures and surgery,
as well as some of the pioneers--the surgeons that foreshadowed our modern medicine.
Recommended Reading: This
Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War. Editorial Review from Publishers
Weekly: Battle is the dramatic centerpiece of Civil War history; this penetrating study looks instead
at the somber aftermath. Historian Faust (Mothers of Invention) notes that the Civil War introduced America to death on an
unprecedented scale and of an unnatural kind—grisly, random and often ending in an unmarked grave far from home. Continued
below...
She surveys the many ways the Civil War generation coped with the trauma: the concept of the Good Death—conscious,
composed and at peace with God; the rise of the embalming industry; the sad attempts of the bereaved to get confirmation of
a soldier's death, sometimes years after war's end; the swelling national movement to recover soldiers' remains and give them
decent burials; the intellectual quest to find meaning—or its absence—in the war's carnage. In the process, she
contends, the nation invented the modern culture of reverence for military death and used the fallen to elaborate its new
concern for individual rights. Faust exhumes a wealth of material—condolence letters, funeral sermons, ads for mourning
dresses, poems and stories from Civil War–era writers—to flesh out her lucid account. The result is an insightful,
often moving portrait of a people torn by grief.
Information regarding: American Civil War and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Soldier Shell Shock, Soldiers
Battle Fatigue Symptoms. Diagnosis. Medical Treatment and Facts, Head Brain Injuries Injury (TBI) Results, Facts, Details,
and History.
|